Are One Handers Viable for Fury Again?

  1. #ane

    Wylyth1992 is offline

    Stood in the Burn Wylyth1992's Avatar


    Question: Will You Take A Disadvantage With Fury With Two One Handed Weapons?

    Because I like the ability of dual wielding, but I rather wield two one handed weapons than two two handed weapon.

  2. #2

    Adoxe is online now

    Immortal Adoxe's Avatar


    Single Minded Fury is not returning as of nonetheless so don't worry about it. It'south not role of the initial Shadowlands changes, Ion only said that they're thinking about making information technology an option in the future. If it ends up happening though, there shouldn't be whatsoever massive advantage, obviously if there's a pair of one handed weapons that have better stats for Fury than the Two-Handed alternative then you'd probably be inclined to play single-minded fury, merely who knows they might just make it a cosmetic just thing or something if they really bring it back.

  3. #3

    Shelly is offline

    Scarab Lord


    You mean other than the current disadvantage of existence unable to utilise whatever of the abilities?

  4. #4

    pinkz is offline

    Dreadlord pinkz's Avatar


    Quote Originally Posted by WFD1992 View Post

    Considering I similar the ability of dual wielding, simply I rather wield two one handed weapons than two two handed weapon.

    dual 1H was powerful until they got rid of SMF talent with the talent trees, and channeled fury to dual 2H. so blizzard robbed the pick.

  5. #five

    Bigbazz is offline

    Old God Bigbazz's Avatar


    It'southward non possible to play Fury with one handers, then there is that.

    I7 6700K : 16GB DDR4 3000 : GTX1070 : Firestudio : Naga : G27


  6. #half-dozen

    crakerjack is offline

    I am Murloc! crakerjack's Avatar


    Yea you won't get far if y'all effort using 2 1-handers. I think what's more realistic than giving them dorsum single minded fury is to simply brand it then they can transmog 2h weapons every bit 1h. That style visually you'll look like you're using dual i-handers without having to rescale annihilation.

    Nearly probable the wisest Enhancement Shaman.


  7. #7

    Razion is offline

    Herald of the Titans Razion's Avatar


    I think the most painless style they tin can implement SMF is if they just let you be able to transmog the 2-Handed weapons into ane-Handed weapons.

  8. #8

    Bigbazz is offline

    Old God Bigbazz's Avatar


    Quote Originally Posted past crakerjack View Post

    Yea you won't get far if you effort using ii 1-handers. I think what'southward more realistic than giving them back unmarried minded fury is to just make it so they can transmog 2h weapons as 1h. That way visually you'll look like you're using dual 1-handers without having to rescale anything.

    Quote Originally Posted past Razion View Post

    I think the near painless mode they can implement SMF is if they only permit you be able to transmog the 2-Handed weapons into ane-Handed weapons.

    Well there is zip unrealistic nearly making 1handers usable again, it's extremely simple from a balancing bespeak of view. This issue purely down to them not wanting to suit animations that they created in Legion for 2handers, which is why transmog only isn't an option considering that problem remains. In Shadowlands they should 100% implement SMF considering it's one of the most requested features for Fury and people take non stopped talking near it since Legion.

    But as for in BFA, y'all literally cannot play Fury with 1handers, yous can't employ your abilities without 2h equipped.

    Final edited by Bigbazz; 2020-06-17 at 07:08 PM.

    I7 6700K : 16GB DDR4 3000 : GTX1070 : Firestudio : Naga : G27


  9. #9

    Vivedesiderata is offline

    Keyboard Turner


    It's official back in the beta! Might switch over from raise to SMF warr

  10. #10

    BananaHandsB is offline

    Warchief BananaHandsB's Avatar


    Quote Originally Posted by Adoxe View Post

    Single Minded Fury is not returning as of yet then don't worry about it. It's non part of the initial Shadowlands changes, Ion merely said that they're thinking about making it an pick in the future.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigbazz View Post

    It'south non possible to play Fury with one handers, so at that place is that.

    Check the home page of mmo-champ. Information technology was just added to the latest shadowlands alpha build.

  11. #11

    Bigbazz is offline

    Old God Bigbazz's Avatar


    Quote Originally Posted by BananaHandsB View Post

    Cheque the home folio of mmo-champ. It was but added to the latest shadowlands alpha build.

    Yeah I but saw, such timing besides!

    I7 6700K : 16GB DDR4 3000 : GTX1070 : Firestudio : Naga : G27


  12. #12

    crakerjack is offline

    I am Murloc! crakerjack's Avatar


    Quote Originally Posted past Bigbazz View Post

    Well there is nothing unrealistic about making 1handers usable again, it's extremely simple from a balancing betoken of view. This event purely downwards to them not wanting to adapt animations that they created in Legion for 2handers, which is why transmog only isn't an option because that problem remains. In Shadowlands they should 100% implement SMF because it's one of the most requested features for Fury and people have non stopped talking almost it since Legion.

    Simply as for in BFA, you literally cannot play Fury with 1handers, y'all can't use your abilities without 2h equipped.

    Idk where you lot're getting your facts that it'due south the almost requested feature, merely realistically, what changes between dual wielding two 2-handers vs 2 ane-handers? What really changes? You lot're still using the same abilities. Ultimately the core reasoning behind wanting SMF is looks, that's it. Information technology's because someone would prefer the pre-wotlk manner of dual wielding ii ane-handers over ii big 2-handers. Too, in Legion, the fury PvP artifact peel was much smaller than other skins, and then it's definitely not out of the discussion that fury animations won't work for smaller weapons. Re-scaling an animation to factor in the size of your transmogged weapon seems highly more likely than to full diddled resurrect SMF and balancing every ability + giving a static % buff. In that location'south simply more than components involved at that point equally opposed to just using transmog and rescaling the animations.

    In the end, that'due south all people who are pro SMF want, to wait similar they're using 2 ane-handers. Has nothing to practice with actually using i-handers.

    Most likely the wisest Enhancement Shaman.


  13. #13

    The Butt Witch is offline

    Banned The Butt Witch's Avatar


    Quote Originally Posted by crakerjack View Post

    Idk where you're getting your facts that it's the virtually requested characteristic, but realistically, what changes betwixt dual wielding two 2-handers vs 2 one-handers? What really changes? You're yet using the aforementioned abilities. Ultimately the core reasoning behind wanting SMF is looks, that's it. It'south because someone would prefer the pre-wotlk style of dual wielding 2 1-handers over 2 big 2-handers. As well, in Legion, the fury PvP antiquity pare was much smaller than other skins, then information technology's definitely not out of the give-and-take that fury animations won't work for smaller weapons. Re-scaling an blitheness to gene in the size of your transmogged weapon seems highly more probable than to full blown resurrect SMF and balancing every power + giving a static % vitrify. There's but more than components involved at that indicate as opposed to simply using transmog and rescaling the animations.

    In the end, that's all people who are pro SMF want, to await like they're using two 1-handers. Has goose egg to do with actually using 1-handers.

    1 handers have lower stats than two handers. That ways if you're using SMF, yous will have a bit less force, less stamina and less secondary stats.

  14. #14

    Zendhal The Black is offline

    The Patient Zendhal The Black's Avatar


    SMF is actually pain fury warriors since you at present have bigger loot tabular array... if a dominate drops 1h and 2h weapon and you become the drop of the opposite you need, it'll be merely frustrating

    You tin skip that with choosing arms/prot spec tho (with prot y'all'll have tank trinkets and shields in loot table tho)


  15. #15

    crakerjack is offline

    I am Murloc! crakerjack's Avatar


    Quote Originally Posted by The Barrel Witch View Post

    I handers take lower stats than two handers. That means if y'all're using SMF, you volition have a bit less strength, less stamina and less secondary stats.

    That'south why they gave SMF a flat xx% vitrify when it first came out. The flat % was changed over time to help make SMF for viable, but that was their solution to overcome the differences in stats and top terminate harm.
    Terminal edited past crakerjack; 2020-06-17 at 07:48 PM.

    Virtually likely the wisest Enhancement Shaman.


  16. #16

    Bigbazz is offline

    Former God Bigbazz's Avatar


    Quote Originally Posted by crakerjack View Post

    Idk where y'all're getting your facts that information technology'southward the most requested feature

    But that's not what I said is it? Are you starting your post purposely to go into an statement with me by twisting what I said into something I didn't? Go read what I said again. Either mode, do you lot not read the forums? People make SMF threads all the fourth dimension, information technology's one of the virtually popular discussions.

    but realistically, what changes between dual wielding 2 2-handers vs 2 1-handers? What really changes?

    The availability of weapons.

    You're still using the aforementioned abilities. Ultimately the cadre reasoning backside wanting SMF is looks, that's it. It'due south because someone would adopt the pre-wotlk mode of dual wielding 2 1-handers over 2 big 2-handers.

    Correct and the merely reason you tin't take SMF in BFA is considering the animations were created only for 2handers, so transmog but would non work without adaptations, Blizzard themselves said this in the past, don't ask me to find it for you I'm not here to teach history by digging through old blueish posts. You can believe what you desire to believe it really doesn't affair.

    Too, in Legion, the fury PvP antiquity skin was much smaller than other skins, so it's definitely non out of the discussion that fury animations won't work for smaller weapons. Re-scaling an animation to factor in the size of your transmogged weapon seems highly more than likely than to full diddled resurrect SMF

    Balancing the numbers is extremely like shooting fish in a barrel, they tin can effectively treat 1h and 2h as the same on the game terminate, they already used this solution 20 years agone in Diablo two, and SMF while information technology was in the game was extremely close to 2h in numbers in spite of the fact that Blizzard didn't opt to utilize this method. Balancing 1h vs 2h is super piece of cake numbers wise, they could make them functionally identical if they wanted.
    Terminal edited by Bigbazz; 2020-06-17 at 09:20 PM.

    I7 6700K : 16GB DDR4 3000 : GTX1070 : Firestudio : Naga : G27


  17. #17

    Puzzony is offline

    Dreadlord Puzzony's Avatar


    Quote Originally Posted past Zendhal The Black View Post

    SMF is really hurting fury warriors since you now take bigger boodle table... if a dominate drops 1h and 2h weapon and you get the drop of the contrary you need, it'll be simply frustrating

    You can skip that with choosing arms/prot spec tho (with prot y'all'll have tank trinkets and shields in loot table tho)

    Choosing fury loot will just drop 1h for weapons, choosing arms will drop 2h but. Problem solved since the rest of the gear is 100% identical.

  18. #eighteen

    Zendhal The Black is offline

    The Patient Zendhal The Black's Avatar


    Quote Originally Posted by Puzzony View Post

    Choosing fury loot will merely driblet 1h for weapons, choosing arms will drop 2h only. Problem solved since the rest of the gear is 100% identical.

    That'southward non how loot specializations work, nor should it ever work like that

  19. #nineteen

    Gotural is offline

    High Overlord


    Quote Originally Posted by Zendhal The Black View Post

    That's not how loot specializations piece of work, nor should it always work like that

    It's not how loot specialization works only allow'southward be honest, from a theoretical signal of view what Puzzony proposed would solve every bug.

  20. #20

    Zendhal The Black is offline

    The Patient Zendhal The Black's Avatar


    Quote Originally Posted by Gotural View Post

    It'south not how loot specialization works but let'southward be honest, from a theoretical point of view what Puzzony proposed would solve every problems.

    Now just immagine new player, playing fury warrior and having no thought why just 1h weapons driblet for him when he wants to play TG

    All in all, the all-time solution would be allowing to transmog 2h into 1h since SMF barely if not at all, changes the playstyle


baezwaythe.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/2555533-Question-Will-You-Have-A-Disadvantage-With-Fury-With-Two-One-Handed-Weapons

0 Response to "Are One Handers Viable for Fury Again?"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel